How does the response look with say a 500ms gate? Reading Toole's last book it also occured to me to look at an 80ms gate as this jives a bit better with how the ear works. Boosting nulls is not usually advised and I wonder if in this circumstance it fills in as you move off axis anyway? Just a thought. So have you taken some off axis measurements? Reason I ask is that you mention adding some boost around 1250hz for what I assume is the main dipole null after the peak. It is going to be the nicest storage area you have ever seen! Or I can call it a spare room and I have to pour new footers, concrete floor, electrical along the outside wall, etc. Turns out I can call it a storage area and close it in without having to pour a new concrete floor or put electrical in the outside wall. The grand plan is to move it all out to a hurricane approved shed in the back yard and close in the porch! I have a contractor arm wrestling with the city fathers over permits right now. The blue tarp has christmas stuff, TV sets, boxes, hurricane supplies, etc. I will not be able to get measurements until the weekend when I have time to setup but it (the passive xover) sounds promising. I have now built a 4th order 3 Khz LR passive xover to stick in one channel of the array and compare it to the active channel. I did the same thing with the mid/hi point starting at 2,000 Hz going up to 4,000 Hz in 500 Hz increments. 400 Hz seemed best to me as a good starting point. (They are currently setup using a DCX2496 and 6 channels of amp).I went from 300 to 800 Hz on the low/mid point in 50 Hz increments, measuring and listening, on and on.
Import studio six into fuzzmeasure series#
I measured on axis FR and went through a series of crossover points. and how do they sound? Gotta sound fantastic after you remove what-ever is under the blue tarp!ĬraigRight now they roughly sound great.
0 kommentar(er)
